United States DOC launches examination into alleged solar AD/CVD circumvention adhering to Auxin Solar petition

Mar 29, 2022 11:44 AM ET
  • The US Division of Commerce (DOC) is to examine alleged circumvention of antidumping and also countervailing duties (AD/CVD) by solar suppliers in Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand as well as Vietnam.
United States DOC launches examination into alleged solar AD/CVD circumvention adhering to Auxin Solar petition
Image: Luke Price/Flickr

The decision to check out complies with a petition filed last month by US supplier Auxin Solar, as well as the DOC will certainly currently start country-wide procedures to determine whether or not solar cells and/or modules made in the Southeast Asian nations use components stemming from China, flouting AD/CVD tariffs.

Nevertheless the decision has drawn in the immediate ire of some in the US solar industry that have said it "endangers" the development of clean power in the US.

In a memo attended to Friday 25 March 2022, the DOC's group baiting antidumping as well as countervailing duty operations recommended that the department examine whether imports of solar cells and/or modules originating from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam are preventing tariffs on Chinese items.

The memo takes place to cite evidence submitted by Auxin Solar to substantiate its petition, including countless reports pertaining to the origin of solar products, the nature of solar wafer, cell and module manufacturing as well as the levels of investment into R&D as well as manufacturing-- as well as exactly how they contrasted geographically-- from some of the industry's largest manufacturers.

Against the initiation, the memo videotaped ideas made by parties that Auxin Solar had actually failed to "identify effectively the goods ... circumventing the orders", however this was dismissed by the DOC's AD/CVD procedures team.

The memo additionally confirms that Hanwha Q CELLS' US as well as Malaysia-based entities argued that any resulting inquiry from the petition ought to be carried out on a company-specific, rather than a country-wide basis, as Auxin Solar had asked for. This request was additionally dismissed, with the DOC searching for that Auxin had offered sufficient proof under policy 19 CFR 351.226 to request a country-wide query.

In a declaration provided today, the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) said the decision by the DOC to consider tariffs of 50-- 250% for solar products getting in the US would be a "bad move" that would have a "terrible effect on the United States solar market", specifically against a backdrop of climbing up module prices.

SEIA further declared the US sector is really feeling the results of a comparable petition raised last November but inevitably dismissed, suggesting it to be a contributing factor to a 19% fall in near-term solar implementation projections in the US.

Taking up the case will certainly "have a chilling result on the solar industry", the trade body said.

"Today's decision replies to the self-interests of one business as well as will result in even more market volatility and also job losses. Additional tariffs will certainly cause the loss of 70,000 American jobs, consisting of 11,000 manufacturing jobs. According to Wood Mackenzie, solar release will certainly crater by 16 Gigawatts yearly if tariffs are enforced," the statement reviews.

What occurs following?

The DOC has said surveys will be sent to business in Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand as well as Vietnam concerning their shipments of cells and modules to the US and also the origin of inputs for those shipments. The memo advises that failing to react may lead to the application of partial or complete facts available from the investigation.

The examination itself could last as much as a year, after which the DOC will wrap up whether it has evidence of circumvention. Ought to it do so, tariffs of up to 250% could be applied to solar cells and/or modules originating from the countries in question and also used retroactively. Such a decision would certainly imply any kind of exporters of solar items based in the named countries would certainly be liable for tariffs.

SEIA has, nonetheless, hired Commerce to toss out the examination. "Solar rates are boosting, federal environment regulations is delayed, and also trade constraints are now worsening. Commerce needs to quickly finish this investigation to alleviate the injury it will certainly create for American workers as well as our nation's efforts to deal with environment modification," it said in a statement.

Shares in US-based thin film solar producer First Solar, considered one of the primary prospective recipients of tariffs arising from the DOC's investigation, climbed by about 6% in trading today.

Solar Installers, Manufacturers