ReMAT
Ninth Circuit Strikes Down California ReMAT In Winding Creek Solar Case
On July 29, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s decision in Winding Creek Solar LLC v. Peterman et al., ruling that California’s feed-in tariff for small qualifying facilities (QFs), the Renewable Market Adjusting Tariff (ReMAT), violates the federal Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) (Ninth Circuit Case No. 17-17531).
Aug 9, 2019 // Plants, Tariffs, Policy, California, Winding Creek Solar LLC, Peterman, QFs, tariff, ReMAT, PURPA, Ninth Circuit, CPUC
Top Products
Best Solar Power BanksBest Portable Power Station
Best Portable Solar Power Generators
Solar Energy Storage Products
Solar Panels
Solar Inverters
Top Softwares
Solar Design SoftwareSolar Monitoring Applications
Asset Management Software
Solar Proposal Software
Solar Project Management Software
Solar Lead Generation Software
Solar Consumer-Facing Platforms
Top Stocks
Solar StocksSolar Indices
Renewable Energy Stocks
Energy Storage Stocks
Energy Commodities
Hydrogen Fuel Cell Stocks
EV Stocks
Top ETFs
Solar Energy ETFsEnergy Storage ETFs
Renewable Energy ETFs
Lithium Battery ETFs
Energy ETFs